Difference between revisions of "Talk:BATE"
Fred Morlan (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. [[User:David Reinstein|David Reinstein]] 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC) | I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. [[User:David Reinstein|David Reinstein]] 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I actually give this further thought, and think it might be best if we split it into two pages: one for discussion of the Bloomfield tournament commonly known as "BATE" and one for the tournament set called "BATE" that kind of spawned from the tournament. Does that sound better?--[[User:Fred Morlan|Fred Morlan]] 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:44, 12 July 2011
This would probably be best served by splitting it into pages about the new version (with updated info, of course) and info on the old, "Jeopardy" version. Thoughts? --Fred Morlan 03:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Additional info: old style BATE [1]. Newer versions, in chronological order: 2009, 2010, 2011.
I would think that the only reason for two separate articles would be the idea that at some point they would both have substantive information. If you think that at some point in the reasonably near future that there will be significant information on the old version on this wiki, then this probably should be two pages. If not, then I don't think it's a problem to just have the old version basically be a footnote to the new version, like it is now. David Reinstein 14:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I actually give this further thought, and think it might be best if we split it into two pages: one for discussion of the Bloomfield tournament commonly known as "BATE" and one for the tournament set called "BATE" that kind of spawned from the tournament. Does that sound better?--Fred Morlan 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)