Difference between revisions of "Talk:Criticisms of the NAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rob Carson (talk | contribs) (nope) |
Rob Carson (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't there be a criticisms of good quizbowl formats page too, for neutrality and all. I know there controversy section on the NAQT already.Zachary Yan (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2014 (PST) | Shouldn't there be a criticisms of good quizbowl formats page too, for neutrality and all. I know there controversy section on the NAQT already.Zachary Yan (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2014 (PST) | ||
| − | Setting aside that a "criticisms of good quizbowl formats" page would be both rather bare and rather pointless, this isn't Wikipedia. No enforced neutrality, no NPOV nonsense. This page exists because the NAC deserves to be criticized, and there is a need for an easily-pointed-to compilation of those criticisms. --[[User:Rob Carson|Rob Carson]] ([[User talk:Rob Carson|talk]]) 15:17, 18 January 2014 (PST) | + | Setting aside that a "criticisms of good quizbowl formats" page would be both rather bare and rather pointless, this isn't Wikipedia. No enforced neutrality, no NPOV nonsense. This page exists because the NAC deserves to be criticized, and because there is a need for an easily-pointed-to compilation of those criticisms. --[[User:Rob Carson|Rob Carson]] ([[User talk:Rob Carson|talk]]) 15:17, 18 January 2014 (PST) |
Revision as of 17:20, 18 January 2014
Shouldn't there be a criticisms of good quizbowl formats page too, for neutrality and all. I know there controversy section on the NAQT already.Zachary Yan (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2014 (PST)
Setting aside that a "criticisms of good quizbowl formats" page would be both rather bare and rather pointless, this isn't Wikipedia. No enforced neutrality, no NPOV nonsense. This page exists because the NAC deserves to be criticized, and because there is a need for an easily-pointed-to compilation of those criticisms. --Rob Carson (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2014 (PST)