Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wyatt Carpenter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Continued discussion.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[http://www.qbwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Inglemoor&diff=28515&oldid=28514 The QBWiki is not the place for in-jokes.] [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (CDT) | [http://www.qbwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Inglemoor&diff=28515&oldid=28514 The QBWiki is not the place for in-jokes.] [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (CDT) | ||
| − | + | :While I respect that you are the admin of this wiki, and thus control its direction, I believe [[:Category:In-jokes]] demonstrates that QBWiki is a great place for in-jokes, and that QBWiki would be incomplete without them. --[[User:Wyatt Carpenter|Wyatt Carpenter]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Carpenter|talk]]) 04:20, 3 July 2016 (CDT) | |
| − | While I respect that you are the admin of this wiki, and thus control its direction, I believe [[:Category:In-jokes]] demonstrates that QBWiki is a great place for in-jokes, and that QBWiki would be incomplete without them. --[[User:Wyatt Carpenter|Wyatt Carpenter]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Carpenter|talk]]) 04:20, 3 July 2016 (CDT) | + | ::That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:56, 3 July 2016
The QBWiki is not the place for in-jokes. Jonah (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (CDT)
- While I respect that you are the admin of this wiki, and thus control its direction, I believe Category:In-jokes demonstrates that QBWiki is a great place for in-jokes, and that QBWiki would be incomplete without them. --Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2016 (CDT)
- That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. Jonah (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT)