Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wyatt Carpenter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT) | ::That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT) | ||
:::Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. [[User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes]])? The serious content would remain on the [[Inglemoor]] page.--[[User:Wyatt Carpenter|Wyatt Carpenter]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Carpenter|talk]]) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT) | :::Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. [[User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes]])? The serious content would remain on the [[Inglemoor]] page.--[[User:Wyatt Carpenter|Wyatt Carpenter]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Carpenter|talk]]) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::My ''opinion'' is that such a thing would be much better on a team Facebook group or something like that, but as a matter of policy, I'm okay with you putting in-jokes on such a sub-page as long as none of them are obscene, rude, mean, or otherwise offensive in any way. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 19:15, 5 July 2016 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::Alright. Thank you very much. --[[User:Wyatt Carpenter|Wyatt Carpenter]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Carpenter|talk]]) 20:24, 5 July 2016 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 5 July 2016
The QBWiki is not the place for in-jokes. Jonah (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (CDT)
- While I respect that you are the admin of this wiki, and thus control its direction, I believe Category:In-jokes demonstrates that QBWiki is a great place for in-jokes, and that QBWiki would be incomplete without them. --Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2016 (CDT)
- That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. Jonah (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT)
- Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes)? The serious content would remain on the Inglemoor page.--Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- My opinion is that such a thing would be much better on a team Facebook group or something like that, but as a matter of policy, I'm okay with you putting in-jokes on such a sub-page as long as none of them are obscene, rude, mean, or otherwise offensive in any way. Jonah (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- Alright. Thank you very much. --Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- My opinion is that such a thing would be much better on a team Facebook group or something like that, but as a matter of policy, I'm okay with you putting in-jokes on such a sub-page as long as none of them are obscene, rude, mean, or otherwise offensive in any way. Jonah (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- Okay, I understand. It does leave me in sort of a pickle, though, because I want to chronicle the entire history of my team, including the incomprehensible nonsense. Would it be alright with you if I recorded the in-jokes on a subpage of my user page (E.g. User:Wyatt Carpenter/In-jokes)? The serious content would remain on the Inglemoor page.--Wyatt Carpenter (talk) 09:48, 5 July 2016 (CDT)
- That category is for well-known inside jokes that have had currency on the circuit as a whole, not incomprehensible nonsense that arose (and as far as I can tell, remained) within a single team. Those pages explain the jokes (more or less), rather than embedding them in legitimate pages. Jonah (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2016 (CDT)