Difference between revisions of "Clock-killing neg"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add an explanation)
(add a clarification)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Clock-killing negs were risky, since a player/coach in charge of keeping score might have added wrong and a team could actually lose the game by 5 points instead of win by 5 points.  In addition, some moderators would cut a team off once it appeared that the team was attempting a clock-killing neg, allowing the trailing team a guess before time runs out.
 
Clock-killing negs were risky, since a player/coach in charge of keeping score might have added wrong and a team could actually lose the game by 5 points instead of win by 5 points.  In addition, some moderators would cut a team off once it appeared that the team was attempting a clock-killing neg, allowing the trailing team a guess before time runs out.
  
A variant of the clock-killing neg is still used in formats with [[bounceback]] bonuses.  If a team is up by less than (maximum possible bonus points - maximum possible tossup points), and the other team has already missed the question, the team that is ahead may buzz in and intentionally miss the question to prevent the possibility of losing on bonus bounceback points.  In formats where the tossup goes dead once any team misses it, a team clinging to a slight lead with only one question remaining may also buzz in and say a wrong answer (or nothing) in order to preserve the victory.  Many formats without rebounding tossups deduct the full value of the question for a wrong answer to prevent this exploit.
+
A variant of the clock-killing neg is still used in formats with [[bounceback]] bonuses.  If a team is up by less than (maximum possible bonus points - maximum possible tossup points), and the other team has already missed the question, the team that is ahead may buzz in and intentionally miss the question to prevent the possibility of losing on bonus bounceback points.  In formats where the tossup goes dead once any team misses it (that is, where tossups do not rebound), a team clinging to a slight lead with only one question remaining may also buzz in and say a wrong answer (or nothing) in order to preserve the victory.  Many formats without rebounding tossups deduct the full value of the question for a wrong answer to prevent this exploit.
  
 
The 2008 change in the [[NAQT]] timing rule, requiring a tossup-bonus cycle to be completed if time expires after the tossup is begun has eliminated the clock-killing neg from pretty much all [[good quizbowl]].
 
The 2008 change in the [[NAQT]] timing rule, requiring a tossup-bonus cycle to be completed if time expires after the tossup is begun has eliminated the clock-killing neg from pretty much all [[good quizbowl]].

Revision as of 17:12, 9 July 2017

The clock-killing neg was a strategy employed during tournaments that use a clock. While leading by more than 5, but less than the maximum possible points in a tossup-bonus cycle, a team could buzz in with few seconds remaining, use the maximum amount of allotted time to begin a response, and then deliver as long an answer as possible, thus ensuring that time would expire before the trailing team could buzz. If a tossup-bonus cycle concluded with only a few seconds left, the team ahead could immediately buzz and just wait for time to run out.

Clock-killing negs were risky, since a player/coach in charge of keeping score might have added wrong and a team could actually lose the game by 5 points instead of win by 5 points. In addition, some moderators would cut a team off once it appeared that the team was attempting a clock-killing neg, allowing the trailing team a guess before time runs out.

A variant of the clock-killing neg is still used in formats with bounceback bonuses. If a team is up by less than (maximum possible bonus points - maximum possible tossup points), and the other team has already missed the question, the team that is ahead may buzz in and intentionally miss the question to prevent the possibility of losing on bonus bounceback points. In formats where the tossup goes dead once any team misses it (that is, where tossups do not rebound), a team clinging to a slight lead with only one question remaining may also buzz in and say a wrong answer (or nothing) in order to preserve the victory. Many formats without rebounding tossups deduct the full value of the question for a wrong answer to prevent this exploit.

The 2008 change in the NAQT timing rule, requiring a tossup-bonus cycle to be completed if time expires after the tossup is begun has eliminated the clock-killing neg from pretty much all good quizbowl.