Difference between revisions of "Arthur's Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Exceptions: found another) |
m (Cat) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example. | Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also [[:Category:Eponymous laws]]. | ||
==Exceptions== | ==Exceptions== | ||
Revision as of 13:34, 29 April 2021
Arthur's Paradox is an observation about quizbowl made by Bruce Arthur. It states that while quizbowl players adore concepts that are doubly-, triply-, or otherwise poly-eponymous, virtually no concepts created by quizbowl players to describe quizbowl are poly-eponymous.
Examples
Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include:
Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example.
See also Category:Eponymous laws.
Exceptions
Noted exceptions to Arthur's Paradox include: