Difference between revisions of "Frequency list"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (rewrite and remove advertising not germane to the general topic of frequency lists)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[NAQT]] publishes '''frequency list'''s for purchase in the categories of [[Literature]], Non-Fiction, [[music]], and [[Fine arts|Art]] (all visual). [[HSAPQ]] also published a list of over 20000 answer lines from their questions sets that can be seen on [http://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AitgvOoiHJZodGxRMk1ubkd2aHc0bDZta2xuRHNfZ0E&output=html this public Google spreadsheet] as announced on [http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=12523 this thread]. Additionally, you can look up "most important (subject matter)" or "100 most famous works of literature" on a search engine to approximate a frequency list.
+
A '''frequency list''' tabulates the number of times that specific topics have appeared in a [[corpus]] of quizbowl questions.
  
These lists also provide an advantage over regular [[list studying]] in that the frequencies give teams a better idea of how important it is to learn each item on the list, and perhaps how [[Important]] the given works are generally.
+
Basic frequency lists contain only the name of topics and their frequency. Some frequency lists may have additional information on each topic, such as creators' birth and death dates, country of origin, etc.
 +
 
 +
==Assessment==
 +
 
 +
Frequency lists provide an advantage over regular [[list studying]] because the frequencies give teams a better idea of how important it is to learn each item on the list, and perhaps how [[important]] the given works are generally.
  
 
Disadvantages of frequency lists include:
 
Disadvantages of frequency lists include:
*the easy potential for the lists to go out of date (NAQT also lets teams purchase updates to the list for a lower price than the initial list)
+
*they may go out of date easily
*the lists may represent recent (and thereby important-to-learn) trends in the [[canon]] as having the same frequency as older works that are rarely asked anymore
+
*they may misrepresent recent (and thereby important-to-learn) [[trend]]s in the [[canon]] as having the same frequency as older works that are rarely asked anymore
*inclusion of seemingly non-academic material, such as children's literature on the literature list
+
*they may include [[non-academic]] material, such as [[children's literature]] in a list of literature
*non-inclusion of important and frequently-asked about works due to inconsistencies in NAQT's topic tagging system
+
*they may omit important and frequently-asked works due to inconsistencies in category or topic tagging systems
*incentive for binary association learning or otherwise discouraging deeper learning of a topic
+
*they may incentivize [[binary association]] learning or otherwise discourage deeper learning of a topic
 +
 
 +
==List of frequency lists==
 +
 
 +
[[NAQT]] has sold frequency lists in various categories, such as [[Literature]], Non-Fiction, [[music]], and [[Fine arts|Art]] (all visual).
 +
 
 +
In December 2011, [[HSAPQ]] published a list of 27,000 raw answerlines (and their categories) extracted from the question sets they produced over the course of about 3 years.<ref>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BAindGz6RPRKb7P4Hw2zDNLSlBHrQMvUwv-uwb8pOFo/pubhtml</ref><ref>http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=12523</ref>
 +
 
 +
You can look up "most important &lt;subject matter>" or "100 most famous works of literature" on a search engine to approximate a frequency list.
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references />
  
 
[[Category:Quizbowl improvement methods]]
 
[[Category:Quizbowl improvement methods]]

Latest revision as of 14:49, 5 May 2021

A frequency list tabulates the number of times that specific topics have appeared in a corpus of quizbowl questions.

Basic frequency lists contain only the name of topics and their frequency. Some frequency lists may have additional information on each topic, such as creators' birth and death dates, country of origin, etc.

Assessment

Frequency lists provide an advantage over regular list studying because the frequencies give teams a better idea of how important it is to learn each item on the list, and perhaps how important the given works are generally.

Disadvantages of frequency lists include:

  • they may go out of date easily
  • they may misrepresent recent (and thereby important-to-learn) trends in the canon as having the same frequency as older works that are rarely asked anymore
  • they may include non-academic material, such as children's literature in a list of literature
  • they may omit important and frequently-asked works due to inconsistencies in category or topic tagging systems
  • they may incentivize binary association learning or otherwise discourage deeper learning of a topic

List of frequency lists

NAQT has sold frequency lists in various categories, such as Literature, Non-Fiction, music, and Art (all visual).

In December 2011, HSAPQ published a list of 27,000 raw answerlines (and their categories) extracted from the question sets they produced over the course of about 3 years.[1][2]

You can look up "most important <subject matter>" or "100 most famous works of literature" on a search engine to approximate a frequency list.

References

  1. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BAindGz6RPRKb7P4Hw2zDNLSlBHrQMvUwv-uwb8pOFo/pubhtml
  2. http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=12523