Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shiva Oswal"
m |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
On this article, you seem to have implemented an editorial policy of removing any information that Tuhin objects to, and making yourself the arbiter of what things are "big deals". This has resulted in you removing a lot of information from the article, which was also the subject of the two prior warnings I have given you (higher up on this page). Given that this is a major issue in the quiz bowl community, the original article was fairly well sourced, and the writers of the removed content have not yet had a chance to respond to the claims Tuhin made (though I just nudged them)—and given your position, I question whether it is prudent for you to be whitewashing the article so thoroughly. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 17:14, 21 May 2021 (CDT) | On this article, you seem to have implemented an editorial policy of removing any information that Tuhin objects to, and making yourself the arbiter of what things are "big deals". This has resulted in you removing a lot of information from the article, which was also the subject of the two prior warnings I have given you (higher up on this page). Given that this is a major issue in the quiz bowl community, the original article was fairly well sourced, and the writers of the removed content have not yet had a chance to respond to the claims Tuhin made (though I just nudged them)—and given your position, I question whether it is prudent for you to be whitewashing the article so thoroughly. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 17:14, 21 May 2021 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Also, I just noticed you inserted the victim's name. Do not ever do that again. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 17:25, 21 May 2021 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 21 May 2021
Removing affiliation of a top scorer
What was the purpose of this edit? Jonah (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2019 (CDT)
Ok, this has been fixed.
Luke Tierney
This edit removed information that, contra your comment, is extremely relevant to quizbowl. It may not have been written in the ideal tone, and you're welcome to adjust that while retaining the key parts (viz., the links). Jonah (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2021 (CDT)
Tuhin Chakraborty
On this article, you seem to have implemented an editorial policy of removing any information that Tuhin objects to, and making yourself the arbiter of what things are "big deals". This has resulted in you removing a lot of information from the article, which was also the subject of the two prior warnings I have given you (higher up on this page). Given that this is a major issue in the quiz bowl community, the original article was fairly well sourced, and the writers of the removed content have not yet had a chance to respond to the claims Tuhin made (though I just nudged them)—and given your position, I question whether it is prudent for you to be whitewashing the article so thoroughly. Jonah (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2021 (CDT)