Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lexicon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Any suggestions for this page? It is currently a long list of dead links. Would it be appropriate to link to PACE's [http://www.pace-nsc.org/pace-quizbowl-lexicon/ actual lexicon]? Is there a better option? [[User:David Reinstein|David Reinstein]] ([[User talk:David Reinstein|talk]]) 19:16, 17 January 2017 (CST) | Any suggestions for this page? It is currently a long list of dead links. Would it be appropriate to link to PACE's [http://www.pace-nsc.org/pace-quizbowl-lexicon/ actual lexicon]? Is there a better option? [[User:David Reinstein|David Reinstein]] ([[User talk:David Reinstein|talk]]) 19:16, 17 January 2017 (CST) | ||
:That seems like a fine idea. I haven't carefully reviewed that link, but it seems more useful than links that don't go anywhere, and the type of lexicon described on this page has very much fallen out of vogue. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 19:32, 17 January 2017 (CST) | :That seems like a fine idea. I haven't carefully reviewed that link, but it seems more useful than links that don't go anywhere, and the type of lexicon described on this page has very much fallen out of vogue. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 19:32, 17 January 2017 (CST) | ||
| + | :Added back in the links in a separate section - worth showcasing how prevalent they once were, I think, and it gives us the option to go through later and try to find archived versions if possible. | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 13 June 2021
Any suggestions for this page? It is currently a long list of dead links. Would it be appropriate to link to PACE's actual lexicon? Is there a better option? David Reinstein (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2017 (CST)
- That seems like a fine idea. I haven't carefully reviewed that link, but it seems more useful than links that don't go anywhere, and the type of lexicon described on this page has very much fallen out of vogue. Jonah (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2017 (CST)
- Added back in the links in a separate section - worth showcasing how prevalent they once were, I think, and it gives us the option to go through later and try to find archived versions if possible.