Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mukherjee-Passner Effect"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This seems suitably deletable given that A. nobody uses the term and B. both eponyms have in fact demonstrably shown some degree of "arrogance" or "bad personal qualities"")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This seems suitably deletable given that A. nobody uses the term and B. both eponyms have in fact demonstrably shown some degree of "arrogance" or "bad personal qualities"
 
This seems suitably deletable given that A. nobody uses the term and B. both eponyms have in fact demonstrably shown some degree of "arrogance" or "bad personal qualities"
 +
 +
 +
:It's certainly not a term that is used anymore. Do we need a catch-all graveyard page for "terms that were once real but nobody uses anymore" as opposed to things like "[[Ladder Theory of Quizbowl|ladder theory of quizbowl]]" that no one ever actually used and were just made up for the Wiki one day, or should they just be deleted outright? [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 08:54, 3 October 2021 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 07:55, 3 October 2021

This seems suitably deletable given that A. nobody uses the term and B. both eponyms have in fact demonstrably shown some degree of "arrogance" or "bad personal qualities"


It's certainly not a term that is used anymore. Do we need a catch-all graveyard page for "terms that were once real but nobody uses anymore" as opposed to things like "ladder theory of quizbowl" that no one ever actually used and were just made up for the Wiki one day, or should they just be deleted outright? Matt Weiner (talk) 08:54, 3 October 2021 (CDT)