Difference between revisions of "Trophy whore"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 44020 by Kevin Wang (talk))
Tags: Undo Removed redirect
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Trophy whoring''' is the act taken by a team/coach to intentionally attend a tournament for the purpose of increasing their odds of placing or winning (a trophy) over a weaker field of teams, rather than attending a tournament with a stronger field of teams that might be more commensurate with the team's ability or readiness to improve.
+
<onlyinclude>
 +
'''Trophy whoring''' is a derogatory term for the act of a [[team]]/[[coach]] intentionally attending [[tournament]]s with weaker [[fields]] for the purpose of [[clubbing baby seals|increasing their odds of performing well and earning a trophy]], either literal or figurative. This behavior is rarely explicitly prohibited, but instead regulated by [[gentleman's agreement]]s: teams are limited only by the norms of [[sportsmanship]] present in the [[good quizbowl]] community, which dictate that teams should seek to compete with opponents of commensurate skill and should endeavor to prioritize abstract goals like "personal improvement" and "meaningful competition," rather than vie for pieces of metal.
  
This practice is greatly frowned upon in the [[Good quizbowl|good quizbowl]] community.
+
[[Players]] or coaches can engage in the similar process of '''stat whoring''' (or '''stats whoring''') by prioritizing personal or team statistics over good sportsmanship. This practice is also frowned upon.
  
Similarly, players or coaches can engage in ''stats whoring''.  This is a practice where a player may decide (or a coach may decide for the player) to play an easier tournament, or to intentionally play down a level (''B'' instead of ''A'' team or ''JV'' instead of ''Varsity'') for the purpose of improving their season statistics for one reason or another.  Like with trophy whoring, this practice is frowned upon in the good quizbowl community.
+
These terms is not frequently used, but shares conceptual groundwork with the [[cult of PPG]].</onlyinclude>
  
However, it should be noted that in an attempt to make a team more well rounded, it is not uncommon for a program to play a very good player on their ''B'' team in order to move up a player who may, after-the-fact, convert fewer tossups, but will make the ''A'' team more well rounded and more successful.  This is especially the case if two good players have a strong overlap in knowledge base.  This is not considered stats whoring.
+
==Exceptions==
 +
Not every instance of a team or player appearing at a event below their ostensible level falls into this category, and in many of these situations it is impractical for outside observers to judge the legitimacy of a team's stated reasons for doing so. For instance, a team could move an ostensibly stronger player to the B team (where they would face weaker teams) in order to achieve broader [[category]] coverage.
  
 +
A team's desire to succeed in events where they face legitimate competition (e.g. at nationals) is considered acceptable, even as they (technically) pursue trophies.
  
 
[[Category:Quizbowl lingo]]
 
[[Category:Quizbowl lingo]]

Revision as of 14:46, 27 October 2021

Trophy whoring is a derogatory term for the act of a team/coach intentionally attending tournaments with weaker fields for the purpose of increasing their odds of performing well and earning a trophy, either literal or figurative. This behavior is rarely explicitly prohibited, but instead regulated by gentleman's agreements: teams are limited only by the norms of sportsmanship present in the good quizbowl community, which dictate that teams should seek to compete with opponents of commensurate skill and should endeavor to prioritize abstract goals like "personal improvement" and "meaningful competition," rather than vie for pieces of metal.

Players or coaches can engage in the similar process of stat whoring (or stats whoring) by prioritizing personal or team statistics over good sportsmanship. This practice is also frowned upon.

These terms is not frequently used, but shares conceptual groundwork with the cult of PPG.

Exceptions

Not every instance of a team or player appearing at a event below their ostensible level falls into this category, and in many of these situations it is impractical for outside observers to judge the legitimacy of a team's stated reasons for doing so. For instance, a team could move an ostensibly stronger player to the B team (where they would face weaker teams) in order to achieve broader category coverage.

A team's desire to succeed in events where they face legitimate competition (e.g. at nationals) is considered acceptable, even as they (technically) pursue trophies.