Difference between revisions of "Arminius scandal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(link) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | The '''Arminius scandal''' occurred at the [[2006 ICT]] when [[R. Hentzel]] combined a rule that does not exist with a fact that is not true to deny a protest that he did not research. This decision ultimately cost [[VCU]] the third-place spot at the tournament.[http://www.hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2610] | |
| + | |||
| + | This article may be biased. | ||
[[Category:Quizbowl scandals]] | [[Category:Quizbowl scandals]] | ||
[[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | [[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 27 November 2021
The Arminius scandal occurred at the 2006 ICT when R. Hentzel combined a rule that does not exist with a fact that is not true to deny a protest that he did not research. This decision ultimately cost VCU the third-place spot at the tournament.[1]
This article may be biased.