Difference between revisions of "Talk:Young's Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This doesn't seem to me like it's in great taste, but I have seen it referenced (jokingly) relatively recently. Do we think it should be deleted anyway? Changed so as to prese...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This doesn't seem to me like it's in great taste, but I have seen it referenced (jokingly) relatively recently. Do we think it should be deleted anyway? Changed so as to present some version of the same idea in some other way? Retained? [[User:Jonah Greenthal|—Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 09:59, 23 December 2023 (CST) | This doesn't seem to me like it's in great taste, but I have seen it referenced (jokingly) relatively recently. Do we think it should be deleted anyway? Changed so as to present some version of the same idea in some other way? Retained? [[User:Jonah Greenthal|—Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 09:59, 23 December 2023 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I say retained; the law, regardless of supposed accuracy, is clearly meant in jest, is extremely amusing to say the least, and is referenced almost constantly, at least in the NE circuit -- Joe Feldman | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 25 December 2023
This doesn't seem to me like it's in great taste, but I have seen it referenced (jokingly) relatively recently. Do we think it should be deleted anyway? Changed so as to present some version of the same idea in some other way? Retained? —Jonah (talk) 09:59, 23 December 2023 (CST)
I say retained; the law, regardless of supposed accuracy, is clearly meant in jest, is extremely amusing to say the least, and is referenced almost constantly, at least in the NE circuit -- Joe Feldman