Difference between revisions of "Talk:Common link"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Is the definition given on this page now universally accepted? During the big debates over "common link questions" in 2011 the term was used to refer to, most famous, a tossup...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Is the definition given on this page now universally accepted? During the big debates over "common link questions" in 2011 the term was used to refer to, most famous, a tossup on "Roman women" that was just a series of social history clues from a Roman history textbook. In practice, the people who disliked these questions did not use the term to refer to "a word or phrase that happens to be common to several distinct entities that are otherwise unrelated and not linked by a theme of any significance" but rather to "any answer line that is not the name of a single person, place, or book."  [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 12:53, 25 May 2021 (CDT)
+
Is the definition given on this page now universally accepted? During the big debates over "common link questions" in 2011 the term was used to refer to, most notoriously, a tossup on "Roman women" that was just a series of social history clues from a Roman history textbook about a topic that one can expect to study in classical history or perhaps various women's studies classes. In practice, the people who disliked these questions did not use the term to refer to "a word or phrase that happens to be common to several distinct entities that are otherwise unrelated and not linked by a theme of any significance" but rather to "any answer line that is not the name of a single person, place, or book."  [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 12:53, 25 May 2021 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 11:53, 25 May 2021

Is the definition given on this page now universally accepted? During the big debates over "common link questions" in 2011 the term was used to refer to, most notoriously, a tossup on "Roman women" that was just a series of social history clues from a Roman history textbook about a topic that one can expect to study in classical history or perhaps various women's studies classes. In practice, the people who disliked these questions did not use the term to refer to "a word or phrase that happens to be common to several distinct entities that are otherwise unrelated and not linked by a theme of any significance" but rather to "any answer line that is not the name of a single person, place, or book." Matt Weiner (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2021 (CDT)