Difference between revisions of "Team"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''team''' is defined as a collection of players who combine their knowledge to score points during a game of quizbowl. A typical team consists of up to four players, though in some places like [[Illinois_Scholastic_Bowl|Illinois]] a fifth player is added.  A team may also contain alternates/substitutes and one or more coaches.
+
<onlyinclude>A '''team''' is defined as a collection of [[players]] who combine their knowledge to score points during a game of quizbowl, as well as one or more [[coach]]es. Generally speaking a team is [[affiliated]] with a [[school]] at either the high school or college level.</onlyinclude>
 +
 
 +
Most formats allow four players to play at once - there may also be [[substitutes]], but for simplicity most [[tournaments]] will limit teams to either six or eight.
 +
In some places (like [[Illinois_Scholastic_Bowl|Illinois]]), a fifth player can be active.
  
 
In [[Knowledge Master Open]] format, there does not appear to be a limit on the number of players that can be on a team at once, so long as they are all students at the same school.
 
In [[Knowledge Master Open]] format, there does not appear to be a limit on the number of players that can be on a team at once, so long as they are all students at the same school.
  
= Types of Teams =
+
==Types of Teams==
While the knowledge base and composition of each team is different, there are general archetypes that teams follow. Coaches and other people who determine team composition for tournaments are encouraged to look at the personnel available to them and decide which archetype best suits their players' strengths.
+
While the knowledge base and composition of each team is different, there are general archetypes that teams follow.
 
+
Coaches and other people who determine team composition for tournaments are encouraged to look at the personnel available to them and decide which archetype best suits their players' strengths.
== One-man teams ==
 
:''See article on [[One-man teams]]''
 
A one-man team consists of one player who scores a lot of tossup points and up to three [[buzzer rock|buzzer rocks]], who in general combine to score about 1 tossup per game or less.  Literal one-man teams (in which a player completely lacks teammates) also fall into this category.
 
 
 
One-man teams can be somewhat successful at the local high school level, though are rarely competitive nationally.  At the college level, literal one-man teams are more common, and have occasionally placed highly at national tournaments.
 
 
 
== [[Generalist]] + [[Specialist]]s ==
 
The most successful team archetype at the college level, virtually every modern champion fits this description to some degree.  At the high school level, this type of team also meets with success, though national competitiveness usually depends on the depth of the generalist.  The four members are usually designated #1, #2, #3, and #4 players, in rough accordance with their points per game averages.
 
 
 
=== The #1 Player ===
 
The #1 player has a wide and deep knowledge base and is the team's primary tossup scorer.  For most top teams, the #1 player is an excellent generalist who can score points in many subjects against quality opponents.  At the high school level, the #1 player often, but not always, serves as the [[captain]].
 
  
=== The #2 Player ===
+
===One-person teams===
The #2 player is an excellent complementary player to the #1, who specializes in multiple categories and supports the #1 with strong buzzes in these areas.  On many championship-level teams, the #2 player is also a solid generalist and plays more like a co-#1.
+
:''See: [[One-person teams]]''
 +
{{:One-person teams}}
  
=== The #3 Player ===
+
===Generalist + Specialists===
The #3 player is a weaker version of either the #1 or #2 player.  On some teams, the #3 player is a generalist with less depth than the team's #1 but has good instincts and buzzer speed. On other teams, the #3 player fills a specific need by specializing in a category that is a relative weakness for both the #1 and #2 players.  In this case, the #3 player is often a solid science player on a team with two strong humanities players.
+
A team which has a single [[generalist]] as the primary point scorer and three [[specialist]]s which provide support. In many cases, national competitiveness is limited by the depth of the generalist.
  
=== The #4 Player ===
+
This is the most successful team archetype at the college level, with virtually every modern champion fitting this description to some degree. At the high school level, this type of team also meets with success with the generalist and top-scorer often being the team's [[captain]].
The #4 player is a wild card. Most #4 players have command of one or two niche subjects and often fill in glaring weaknesses in a team's knowledge base.  At [[NAQT]] events, the #4 player is often a trash/current events/general knowledge specialist, due to the large amount of emphasis placed in those categories.  The #4 sometimes fulfills the same role as the #3 player, but with a different focus.
 
  
Even if a team plays a consistent lineup at every tournament, the roles of players within this paradigm may change.  For instance, the [[2008 Maryland]] team featured [[Jonathan Magin]] as the team's typical #1 player; however, [[2008 ICT|ICT]] catered more to [[Charles Meigs|Charles Meigs']] strengths, and it could be argued that Meigs was the #1 on the ICT team while Magin moved to a #2 role.
+
Historically, the most common type of generalist has specialized in [[humanities]] ([[Andrew Yaphe]], [[Matt Bollinger]], [[Matt Jackson]], [[Jordan Brownstein]]), and so many of the top teams have had a skilled [[science]] specialist. There have, however, also been science-oriented generalists ([[Mike Sorice]], [[Seth Teitler]], [[Auroni Gupta]]).
  
Occasionally, the #3 or #4 player serves as the teams' primary winner of buzzer races on giveaways; this "assassin" role is vital among teams where the #1 and #2 are just a hair slower, and it makes these teams that much more aggravating to play against.  A good example is MIT 2008's [[Jason Trigg]].
+
At [[NAQT]] events, one of the specialists is often a [[trash]]/[[current events]]/[[general knowledge]] specialist, due to the large amount of emphasis placed in those categories.
  
== Four Specialists ==
+
===Four Specialists===
 
Extremely common among top-tier high school teams, less common in college.  Three of the four specialists are almost always a literature specialist, and history specialist, and a science specialist.  The fourth specialist is often a computation specialist in high school formats that place emphasis on computation questions.  Other common specialties for the fourth specialist are arts, pop culture/current events, or providing overlap in literature, history, or science.
 
Extremely common among top-tier high school teams, less common in college.  Three of the four specialists are almost always a literature specialist, and history specialist, and a science specialist.  The fourth specialist is often a computation specialist in high school formats that place emphasis on computation questions.  Other common specialties for the fourth specialist are arts, pop culture/current events, or providing overlap in literature, history, or science.
  
== Whoever Shows Up ==
+
===Whoever Shows Up===
 
This team is made up of whoever can come to a particular tournament, without regard for balancing team strengths.  Team members may significantly overlap in their strengths and lack knowledge in one or more major categories, leading to an imbalanced and often weak team.
 
This team is made up of whoever can come to a particular tournament, without regard for balancing team strengths.  Team members may significantly overlap in their strengths and lack knowledge in one or more major categories, leading to an imbalanced and often weak team.
  

Latest revision as of 15:48, 10 February 2023

A team is defined as a collection of players who combine their knowledge to score points during a game of quizbowl, as well as one or more coaches. Generally speaking a team is affiliated with a school at either the high school or college level.

Most formats allow four players to play at once - there may also be substitutes, but for simplicity most tournaments will limit teams to either six or eight. In some places (like Illinois), a fifth player can be active.

In Knowledge Master Open format, there does not appear to be a limit on the number of players that can be on a team at once, so long as they are all students at the same school.

Types of Teams

While the knowledge base and composition of each team is different, there are general archetypes that teams follow. Coaches and other people who determine team composition for tournaments are encouraged to look at the personnel available to them and decide which archetype best suits their players' strengths.

One-person teams

See: One-person teams

A one-person team (or one-man team) is a team with multiple players on it whose fate is perceived to be entirely tied to the scoring abilities of a single player. Literal one-person teams (i.e. those with only a single individual on them) are sometimes called "one-person teams", but are typically referred to as playing solo instead.

The term is both laudatory and derisive - while it celebrates the skill of the "one-person" in question, it minimizes the contributions of their teammates (which are often significant) and carries with it the implication that the "one-person" is succeeding in part because of their lack of support. Because of the derogatory connotations, and especially the implied insult to the teammates of the "one-person," it is not a good idea to use this term in reference to any team in your tournament when you are the TD or moderator.

Generalist + Specialists

A team which has a single generalist as the primary point scorer and three specialists which provide support. In many cases, national competitiveness is limited by the depth of the generalist.

This is the most successful team archetype at the college level, with virtually every modern champion fitting this description to some degree. At the high school level, this type of team also meets with success with the generalist and top-scorer often being the team's captain.

Historically, the most common type of generalist has specialized in humanities (Andrew Yaphe, Matt Bollinger, Matt Jackson, Jordan Brownstein), and so many of the top teams have had a skilled science specialist. There have, however, also been science-oriented generalists (Mike Sorice, Seth Teitler, Auroni Gupta).

At NAQT events, one of the specialists is often a trash/current events/general knowledge specialist, due to the large amount of emphasis placed in those categories.

Four Specialists

Extremely common among top-tier high school teams, less common in college. Three of the four specialists are almost always a literature specialist, and history specialist, and a science specialist. The fourth specialist is often a computation specialist in high school formats that place emphasis on computation questions. Other common specialties for the fourth specialist are arts, pop culture/current events, or providing overlap in literature, history, or science.

Whoever Shows Up

This team is made up of whoever can come to a particular tournament, without regard for balancing team strengths. Team members may significantly overlap in their strengths and lack knowledge in one or more major categories, leading to an imbalanced and often weak team.