Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chicago Open"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Matt Weiner (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Not to self-promote too much, but could the 2017 editors maybe decided who was actually second place at that tournament? The team I was on had a higher playoff PPG than any of...") |
Alex Damisch (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Not to self-promote too much, but could the 2017 editors maybe | + | Not to self-promote too much, but could the 2017 editors maybe decide who was actually second place at that tournament? The team I was on had a higher playoff PPG than any of the other teams in the tie, but at some point this page was changed to recognize the team with the higher total PPG, incorporating completely different prelim schedules, which doesn't seem like the right metric. [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 15:13, 27 August 2021 (CDT) |
| + | |||
| + | I've been thinking about that since I edited this page to incorporate 2021 stuff. IMO the table should just list the composition of all teams that tied for nth place. [[User:Alex Damisch|Alex Damisch]] ([[User talk:Alex Damisch|talk]]) 17:12, 27 August 2021 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 27 August 2021
Not to self-promote too much, but could the 2017 editors maybe decide who was actually second place at that tournament? The team I was on had a higher playoff PPG than any of the other teams in the tie, but at some point this page was changed to recognize the team with the higher total PPG, incorporating completely different prelim schedules, which doesn't seem like the right metric. Matt Weiner (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2021 (CDT)
I've been thinking about that since I edited this page to incorporate 2021 stuff. IMO the table should just list the composition of all teams that tied for nth place. Alex Damisch (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2021 (CDT)