Difference between revisions of "Talk:2002 MSHSAA State Championship"
Jeffrey Hill (talk | contribs) |
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
—[[User:Jeffrey Hill|Jeffrey Hill]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey Hill|talk]]) 17:03, 20 January 2022 (CST) | —[[User:Jeffrey Hill|Jeffrey Hill]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey Hill|talk]]) 17:03, 20 January 2022 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :The phrases "female-identifying individual" or "person who publicly identified as female at the time" are options - I've opted to use the former for the time being, though of course this can still be a subject of discussion. -[[User:Kevin Wang|Kevin Wang]] ([[User talk:Kevin Wang|talk]]) 12:05, 24 January 2022 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 12:05, 24 January 2022
"Melissa McCush's 117 tossups throughout the day was the second most by any individual to date and set the record for most tossups answered correctly by a female at the state championship in any class, also becoming the first female in tournament history to answer more than 50 tossups correctly. This also set the Class 3 record, which was previously 99 by Sean Phillips of Boonville in 2000. This total remained the Class 3 record until Sophie Lockwood of Hallsville correctly answered 136 tossups in 2018."
I think the bolded parts may be problematic in conjunction, though I'm not privy to either player's personal gender. What should be done here? Is there a better way to word the "female record" clause, or would it be best just to remove it?
—Eric Yin (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2022 (CST)
I think I would remove it.
—Jeffrey Hill (talk) 17:03, 20 January 2022 (CST)
- The phrases "female-identifying individual" or "person who publicly identified as female at the time" are options - I've opted to use the former for the time being, though of course this can still be a subject of discussion. -Kevin Wang (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2022 (CST)