Difference between revisions of "Arthur's Paradox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
fix>QBWikiBot |
Mike Sorice (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include: | Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include: | ||
* [[Weiner's Laws]] | * [[Weiner's Laws]] | ||
| − | * [[Sorice's | + | * [[Sorice's Rules of Blogs]] |
* [[Magin's Analogy]] | * [[Magin's Analogy]] | ||
* [[Magin's Law]] | * [[Magin's Law]] | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 10 March 2019
Arthur's Paradox is an observation about quizbowl made by Bruce Arthur. It states that while quizbowl players adore concepts that are doubly-, triply-, or otherwise poly-eponymous, virtually no concepts created by quizbowl players to describe quizbowl are poly-eponymous.
Examples
Examples of mono-eponymous concepts include:
Ironically, Arthur's Paradox is also an example.
Exceptions
Noted exceptions to Arthur's Paradox include: