Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arminius scandal"

From QBWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Can probably be folded into the page on the 2006 ICT.  There were several events at that tournament that led to players on contending teams being less than thrilled with it, but "NAQT has fixed many of these issues in the intervening 14 years" is an equally important part of the story.  [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 05:45, 25 December 2020 (CST)
 
Can probably be folded into the page on the 2006 ICT.  There were several events at that tournament that led to players on contending teams being less than thrilled with it, but "NAQT has fixed many of these issues in the intervening 14 years" is an equally important part of the story.  [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 05:45, 25 December 2020 (CST)
 +
 +
I can move the information over, but there won't be much: the thread stops rather abruptly and I'm not familiar with what the state of the NAQT rulebook was at the 2006 ICT. I think ideally someone could edit in a little more context to go alongside this. -[[User:Kevin Wang|Kevin Wang]] ([[User talk:Kevin Wang|talk]])

Revision as of 11:45, 25 December 2020

Is this really a "scandal," or is it just Matt Weiner venting his frustration about his denied protest? Should this page even exist at all?
- Eric Yin


Can probably be folded into the page on the 2006 ICT. There were several events at that tournament that led to players on contending teams being less than thrilled with it, but "NAQT has fixed many of these issues in the intervening 14 years" is an equally important part of the story. Matt Weiner (talk) 05:45, 25 December 2020 (CST)

I can move the information over, but there won't be much: the thread stops rather abruptly and I'm not familiar with what the state of the NAQT rulebook was at the 2006 ICT. I think ideally someone could edit in a little more context to go alongside this. -Kevin Wang (talk)