Difference between revisions of "Talk:Undergraduate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Zac Bennett (talk | contribs) |
Zac Bennett (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I do not believe it is the case that people don't think the NAQT or ACF titles are "legitimate." They may be viewed as "lesser" in a sense than the overall title, and the concerns about top UGs being excluded due to playing on teams with grad students are real, but these seem to be fairly competitive titles that the contenders for them care about. [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 14:22, 16 October 2023 (CDT) | I do not believe it is the case that people don't think the NAQT or ACF titles are "legitimate." They may be viewed as "lesser" in a sense than the overall title, and the concerns about top UGs being excluded due to playing on teams with grad students are real, but these seem to be fairly competitive titles that the contenders for them care about. [[User:Matt Weiner|Matt Weiner]] ([[User talk:Matt Weiner|talk]]) 14:22, 16 October 2023 (CDT) | ||
:I don't necessarily think that either, hence why I put the word in quotes when I wrote the article. I think I just put that there because that was the sentiment that came to mind for why the UG nationals was created. If you think there's a better word to use there, feel free to change it. [[User:Zac Bennett|Zac Bennett]] ([[User talk:Zac Bennett|talk]]) 15:49, 16 October 2023 (CDT) | :I don't necessarily think that either, hence why I put the word in quotes when I wrote the article. I think I just put that there because that was the sentiment that came to mind for why the UG nationals was created. If you think there's a better word to use there, feel free to change it. [[User:Zac Bennett|Zac Bennett]] ([[User talk:Zac Bennett|talk]]) 15:49, 16 October 2023 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I've changed the wording to be a bit less dismissive of those titles, and to focus more on the nature of the concerns. [[User:Zac Bennett|Zac Bennett]] ([[User talk:Zac Bennett|talk]]) 10:37, 17 October 2023 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 17 October 2023
I do not believe it is the case that people don't think the NAQT or ACF titles are "legitimate." They may be viewed as "lesser" in a sense than the overall title, and the concerns about top UGs being excluded due to playing on teams with grad students are real, but these seem to be fairly competitive titles that the contenders for them care about. Matt Weiner (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2023 (CDT)
- I don't necessarily think that either, hence why I put the word in quotes when I wrote the article. I think I just put that there because that was the sentiment that came to mind for why the UG nationals was created. If you think there's a better word to use there, feel free to change it. Zac Bennett (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2023 (CDT)
- I've changed the wording to be a bit less dismissive of those titles, and to focus more on the nature of the concerns. Zac Bennett (talk) 10:37, 17 October 2023 (CDT)