Difference between revisions of "2019 NHBB Online"
Ameya Singh (talk | contribs) m (Tbh - brainchild is a bit of an odd word choice.) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''See also: [[Question recycling]]'' | :''See also: [[Question recycling]]'' | ||
− | The '''2019 "[[NHBB]]" Discord Tournament''' was an online history bee-style tournament held during April 2019 on Discord servers. | + | The '''2019 "[[NHBB]]" Discord Tournament''' was an online history bee-style tournament held during April 2019 on Discord servers. [[Laurel Springs]] NHB player [[User:Ameya Singh|Ameya Singh]] created the event, the tournament was won by [[Sam Brochin]] in a small field. Besides being called a logistical mess by some people involved, the event attracted controversy after it was revealed that a number of questions it used were more or less plagiarized from [[QuizDB]] and/or past NHBB events, resulting in a minor scandal. |
==Aftermath and "scandal"== | ==Aftermath and "scandal"== |
Revision as of 17:54, 10 May 2019
- See also: Question recycling
The 2019 "NHBB" Discord Tournament was an online history bee-style tournament held during April 2019 on Discord servers. Laurel Springs NHB player Ameya Singh created the event, the tournament was won by Sam Brochin in a small field. Besides being called a logistical mess by some people involved, the event attracted controversy after it was revealed that a number of questions it used were more or less plagiarized from QuizDB and/or past NHBB events, resulting in a minor scandal.
Aftermath and "scandal"
The tournament had consistently promoted itself as a housewrite. However, as documented on this thread, after the tournament's preliminary stages had concluded and packets had been uploaded online, numerous members of the QB community pointed out that many of the tossups used in the tournament were either directly copied from, or extremely similar to, questions used in past tournaments run by other organizations, even though it admitted to not being affiliated in any way with either NHBB or International Academic Competitions (IAC). Some also pointed out that this attempt to essentially pass off questions written by other writers as their own work might potentially constitute copyright infringement.
The above debacle was likely the result of a last-minute rush to 'fill out' incomplete packets that were missing a large number of questions. Some posters on the above thread also said they believed Singh to be too inexperienced to be TD'ing a tournament, but that he still "should have known better".
Fortunately, Singh eventually later apologized for his errors.
Packets used
Samples from the prelims include: