Difference between revisions of "Talk:2019 NHBB Online"
Ameya Singh (talk | contribs) |
(→Editing War...: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I'll make Packet 1 public (since it had the plagiarism). I'm gonna keep Packet 2 and 3 private mainly since it isn't my Intellectual Property (I only have them hosted on ymy Docs account). Hope that's clear - Ameya | I'll make Packet 1 public (since it had the plagiarism). I'm gonna keep Packet 2 and 3 private mainly since it isn't my Intellectual Property (I only have them hosted on ymy Docs account). Hope that's clear - Ameya | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Editing War... == | ||
+ | |||
+ | User [[User:Kevin Wang|Kevin Wang]] and I seem to have a disagreement on what this article should look like. What do we do? [[User:Nate Kang|Nate Kang]] ([[User talk:Nate Kang|talk]]) 22:43, 12 May 2019 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:43, 12 May 2019
Few things - NHBB Online is the name for this, I never "consistently" called this event an housewrite. I was clear in the Discord about this not being a housewrite, but more of past history TUs. What I posted in forums was vague and can be interpreted as false advertising. Making a page for this is redundant and is a improperly filtered version of the events that occured. I have a link to the entire unfiltered thing in my bio. - Ameya
- This article should be improved by adding clearer information about what happened and didn't happen, who all was involved, and the community reaction to the concept. Jonah (talk) 22:54, 10 May 2019 (CDT)
The google docs of the three packets do not have public access. The one that claims to be marked for plagiarism is not marked for plagiarism. David Reinstein (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2019 (CDT)
- Yes, I have removed the link to the doc that falsely claims to be marked. Nate Kang (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2019 (CDT)
Why are the docs no longer publicly accessible?
Ameya, since I suspect that you are the owner of the Google Docs in question that are linked in this article, please restore public accessibility to them for the sake of the QBWiki community! Don't fear; your past mistakes are largely forgiven, so please show transparency. I assure you that the purpose of this article is NOT to shame you. -Nate Kang (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2019 (CDT)
I'll make Packet 1 public (since it had the plagiarism). I'm gonna keep Packet 2 and 3 private mainly since it isn't my Intellectual Property (I only have them hosted on ymy Docs account). Hope that's clear - Ameya
Editing War...
User Kevin Wang and I seem to have a disagreement on what this article should look like. What do we do? Nate Kang (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2019 (CDT)