Difference between revisions of "Zone out"
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) (Redirected page to Quizbowl lingo#zone out) Tag: New redirect |
Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 44026 by Kevin Wang (talk)) Tags: Undo Removed redirect |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | To '''zone out''' is to fail to pay attention to the [[tossup]] until magically becoming alert at the sound of "For ten points". Players often zone out on questions about areas that they have no knowledge in. This is particularly problematic on science questions, where occasionally every humanities player in the room will zone out off the mention of things that sound like boring science. | |
+ | |||
+ | Zoning out is generally considered [[bad quizbowl]] because players who zone out learn nothing from the question, so that they not only will not get this question, but are guaranteed not to get subsequent questions on that topic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It has been suggested that on a team with, say, a physics specialist and three players with limited knowledge of physics, it is more beneficial for the three non-physics players to zone out on physics questions to conserve mental energy for tossups in their areas of specialty than it is for all four to listen to the question. However, this argument in general only applies to major national tournaments where fatigue may become a factor in a team's ability to win pivotal games. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category: Quizbowl lingo]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Original QBWiki Page]] |
Revision as of 08:00, 28 October 2021
To zone out is to fail to pay attention to the tossup until magically becoming alert at the sound of "For ten points". Players often zone out on questions about areas that they have no knowledge in. This is particularly problematic on science questions, where occasionally every humanities player in the room will zone out off the mention of things that sound like boring science.
Zoning out is generally considered bad quizbowl because players who zone out learn nothing from the question, so that they not only will not get this question, but are guaranteed not to get subsequent questions on that topic.
It has been suggested that on a team with, say, a physics specialist and three players with limited knowledge of physics, it is more beneficial for the three non-physics players to zone out on physics questions to conserve mental energy for tossups in their areas of specialty than it is for all four to listen to the question. However, this argument in general only applies to major national tournaments where fatigue may become a factor in a team's ability to win pivotal games.