Difference between revisions of "File talk:Skt.jpeg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (signature) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this a great idea? I am not a lawyer, but the [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing fair use laws] here are really sketchy, especially for an article that is rather critical of SKT. -[[User:George Tagtmeier|George Tagtmeier]] ([[User talk:George Tagtmeier|talk]]) 22:21, 17 August 2022 (CDT) | Is this a great idea? I am not a lawyer, but the [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing fair use laws] here are really sketchy, especially for an article that is rather critical of SKT. -[[User:George Tagtmeier|George Tagtmeier]] ([[User talk:George Tagtmeier|talk]]) 22:21, 17 August 2022 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I think the page is poorly written and quite possibly unsuitable for the QBWiki, but I don't think the logo aspect is important. In fact, criticism probably strengthens the case for fair use—no reasonable person could think that the page was the property of or endorsed by SKT. [[User:Jonah Greenthal|—Jonah]] ([[User talk:Jonah Greenthal|talk]]) 07:58, 18 August 2022 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:58, 18 August 2022
Is this a great idea? I am not a lawyer, but the fair use laws here are really sketchy, especially for an article that is rather critical of SKT. -George Tagtmeier (talk) 22:21, 17 August 2022 (CDT)
- I think the page is poorly written and quite possibly unsuitable for the QBWiki, but I don't think the logo aspect is important. In fact, criticism probably strengthens the case for fair use—no reasonable person could think that the page was the property of or endorsed by SKT. —Jonah (talk) 07:58, 18 August 2022 (CDT)
