Fairness

From QBWiki
Revision as of 10:08, 15 June 2021 by Kevin Wang (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<onlyinclude>The concept of '''fairness''' is the idea that the two teams competing in a game of quizbowl should have equivalent opportunity to receive points and ulti...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The concept of fairness is the idea that the two teams competing in a game of quizbowl should have equivalent opportunity to receive points and ultimately win. For a game to be fair, both the questions and the format must be fair.

In a perfectly fair setting, the team which has more knowledge should always win the game, but this would require teams to play an infinite number of perfect questions to remove all variance. Thus, things are typically considered fair if there are no structural problems which produce unfairness.

Sources of unfairness

A major of unfairness is difficulty variation between questions or between rounds. This is especially pronounced when there are systematic variations in the difficulty of a specific category, but is also true when it affects random questions. Because there are a finite number of questions in a round of quizbowl and a finite number of rounds in a tournament, teams which are affected by such variations will not be able to correct for the discrepancy. Because it is not possible to write questions which are exactly the same difficulty, it is typically accepted that the questions in a set will take on some distribution.

The standard for a fair tossup is that it is well-written and pyramidal - this allows the maximum opportunity for a team with superior knowledge to buzz first and answer correctly. Conversely, an unfair question can be poorly written, apyramidal, or both. Things like factual errors and hoses are inherently unfair, because they disadvantage teams which know more.

There is explicit unfairness in some bad quizbowl formats. College Bowl is infamous for playoff formats which disadvantage particularly teams.

Before the standardization of 30-point bonuses,

Things that are not inherently unfair

Random chance is not unfair, though it may produce unexpected results.

There is significant debate with how fair