Talk:Fraud
Revision as of 19:33, 25 May 2022 by Matt Jackson (talk | contribs) (Created page with "It feels like the meaning of this term has changed over time; I don't think of, say, "buzzed on a Nobel Prize clue" as fraudulent, even if grinding that knowledge is tedious a...")
It feels like the meaning of this term has changed over time; I don't think of, say, "buzzed on a Nobel Prize clue" as fraudulent, even if grinding that knowledge is tedious and frowned-upon. And writing standards have changed a lot; questions that "encourage fraud" aren't nearly as much of A Thing anymore, that Witch of Endor example is absurd, and good writers now include some clues they expect to be difficult in a vacuum precisely because they help thoughtful players narrow down the potential answer space. --Matt Jackson 5/25/2022