What are your views on the barriers to distribution of packet sets? I see two different possible positions on the matter. 1. Once a tournament has been completed, the packet sets become public domain. The packet sets are to be placed on something like the Stanford Archive for the use of anyone who wishes to download them. 2. Once a tournament has been completed, the packet sets remain the property of the individual or organization that produced the packet set or ran the tournament. The hosting organization has the right to charge a nominal fee or request a packet trade for someone else to acquire the questions, either in perpetuity or for a period of limitations like two years. The second view is somewhat flawed because once the host organization sells one packet set, that set can be acquired from then on from the buyer. This loophole is closed by not giving out the set at all, but that is not very productive. ACF seems to subscribe to the second view. They currently have the sets from ACF tournaments from 2000-2001 and earlier available for download. Berkeley seems to subscribe to the first theory, as I was told they have put this year's WIT on the Stanford Archive. What are your views? Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST