> --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, abillsmood <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: > > While I agree with your position that using 1980-2003 as > > restrictions on trash questions does not guarantee that it is > > focused perfectly toward college-age players, I think you need only > > look to Trivial Pursuit 20th Anniversary edition's entertainment > > category and compare it to the original's entertainent category to > > see that the idea has merit ;) If this leads some people to > > challenge themselves to find the most minute, annoying, unreleased > > movie or 4 episode tv show of the 80's or 90's, then we will deal > > with that as editors. However, I believe it will lead to more > > familiar subject matter (as kids we watched 1980's kiddie movies; > as > > teenagers, we watched 1980's comedy reruns on cable and snuck into > > early 1990's R-rated movies; some of us may have gone to the local > > metropolitan movie theater to see a remastering of His Girl Friday, > > and good for them for getting in touch with the past, but it's > > simply not our generation). Or, for that matter, Masters players' generation. > > I, personally, believe that enough > > happened in these last 23 years to make a perfectly reasonable set > > of packets for the tournament. Furthermore, there remains ample > > room for a few questions each round on cultural items that continue > > to affect our generation (the Beatles, A+W Root Beer, Miles Davis, > > etc. NOT Dr. Kildare, unless, I suppose, it's the John Flansburgh > > song). > Man, if we are to have A&W Root Beer questions, I would certainly hope they focus on its pre-1980 incarnation. A&W Root Beer are such sellouts. I remember the old days, when they were making albums like "Never Mind the Bollocks, Here's A&W Root Beer" and "Q: Are We Not Men? A: We are A&W Root Beer." Now, it's all "A Very Special A&W Rootbeer Christmas" and "A&W Root Beer Sings the Songs of Burt Bacharach". Now it's about the money, but it used to be about the root beer. > > > If it turns out that this doesn't come to pass, then I > > suppose Chris and I will work a bit harder on editing, and your > > position will be justified. I still think it'll be fun though. > I was thinking about this, and actually, my chief problem with trash isn't obscurity -- it's asking too many, and too deep, questions on non-obscure topics which are (however) obscure to the average college bowl player. Let's face it -- a fair number of people who play college bowl are nerds (openly or in denial), and nerds or no, the vast majority of them are reasonably intelligent. This, then, makes questions about such august topics as the aforementioned Ms. Spears, or the works of Pauly Shore, or this Joseph Millionaire business (mercifully) less accessible than some people seem to think they should be. We don't watch that stuff (for the most part). Stupid people watch that stuff. > > > P.S. Too far? That's sad. We get Penn Bowl and Qotc. Everything > > else is either Maryland/DC (3 hours) or Boston (4.5 hours). I > think > > you Boston schools owe us for making it to your TRASH regionals and > > junior-bird tournaments ;) > Princeton has cars, doesn't it? This is a major difference. > Not speaking for any larger organization of people, Erik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST