> > Another premise well worth strong disagreement. Perhaps the 2003
> > Detroit Red Wings really ought to have been declared NHL champions
> > based on their regular season performance, rather than the travesty
> > of seeing them swept in the playoffs by a clearly inferior team.
> Or
> > perhaps not.
>
> Perhaps hockey has nothing to do with quiz bowl. Or perhaps not.
Seriously, the hockey analogy is lame. It's bad enough that NAQT
players have to put up with a disproportionate amount of crappy bad
questions because a few lame writers (who, sadly, are among the more
prolific writers) think it's cool to subject them repeatedly to their
personal whims. I guess it's not as bad as a certain circuit member
who flooded every one of his packets with questions on a certain
terrible Swedish band and a certain Olympic non sport followed only by
pedophiles and homosexuals, but still.