Dear Mini-Mueller, I would hardly call Chris' edit "obscenity-laden" since he's only using the "f" word once. Trust me when I say I've known Chris for years and that amount of restraint shocks me. No use of the "n" word, no calling out various disparaging things about Tuttle's mother, no ominous threats to urinate on Tuttle's front door. Frankel man, what happened to you? Sean --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, "Kyle Hill" <atlashill_at_...> wrote: > > > Using IP lookup <http://ws.arin.net/whois/? queryinput=140.180.144.31> > this evening, the anonymous IP was traced to a computer at Princeton. > This is unfortunate, as said obscenity-laden edit to the article itself > <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=College_Bowl&diff=48239533&ol\ > did=44771870> won't help bring a Neutral Point of View to the CBI > article. I do concur that edits made by David Tuttle and Mary Oberembt > were apparently to remove unpleasant facets of CBI's history and should > not occur either. > > I cleaned up the talk page this morning, so hopefully the plurality of > us will agree to refrain from Wikipedia edits disruptinve to the > building of a strong quiz bowl community. > > Good night and good luck. > > --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, "Kyle Hill" <atlashill_at_> wrote: > > > > --- In quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com, ater31337 no_reply_at_ wrote: > > > > > > and why does he keep censoring legitimate discussion about CBI's > flaws > > > on Wikipedia? > > > > > > P.S. Wikipedia sucks, stop writing about it. > > > > > > (Also view the CBI entry on Wikipedia to see his activism in > deleting > > > anything that might oppose his interest in CBI... He's been editing > > > since 1984!.) > > > > > > > Legitimate discussion does not include obscenity-laden edits to the > > article itself, whoever that anonymous twit was. That said, Tuttle > > did counter an edit made four months before by a David Levinson. > > Tuttle said on his user talk page that he's worked with CBI before, > > helping at regional tournaments in California and Texas, as well as > > assisting at nationals. Though his edits appear to be saving- face, I > > would recommend finding outside sources to verify what he erased. > > Given how disorganizaed the talk page is, a "Request for Comment" > > might be in the works if such vociferous debate continues. > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:48 AM EST EST