As I pointed out earlier on this message board, I am sending out one more survey regarding Penn Bowl. The main thrust of this survey is playoff formats: in the past couple of weeks, I have had several heated discussions in the chat room on the subject, and I'd like to know what people *really* think about the issue. I truly want to hear from as many people as possible--even if you don't plan to take part in Penn Bowl X, you can still make your voice heard. This isn't meant as a referendum; however, if clear trends emerge among potential participants, we will definitely consider that in deciding the playoff format. In your reply, please include the following information: [a] Your name and school, if it's not in a .sig file or your address; [b] If you've ever participated in Penn Bowl before; and [c] If you think you may compete *or* moderate at PB10. I would ask that you return this survey no later than JUNE 15, 2000. If I get at least 30 responses by that date, I will post the results to this board. Again, if you wish to make your voice heard, and possibly affect the way Penn Bowl 10 is run, I hope you will take the time to fill out this survey; in any case, I hope to hear from many of you soon. Samer Ismail Tournament Director, Penn Bowl X ***************** QUESTION 1: Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5 how strongly you support the use of the following formats for the playoffs of Penn Bowl X [1 = strongly oppose, 3 = neutral, 5 = strongly support]. [A] single-elimination for the top ~16 teams, as done in the past. [B] single-elimination playoffs for 64 teams (an "all-play" format). [C] double-elimination. [D] Swiss pairs. [E] power-matching. [F] ladder play. [G] single-bracket round robin among the top few teams. [H] two or four round robin brackets of a few teams each, with the top team in each bracket advancing. [I] weighted best-of-3 series among the top few teams. QUESTION 2: Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5 how strongly you support the use of the following formats ***for the finals*** of Penn Bowl X [1 = strongly oppose, 3 = neutral, 5 = strongly support]. [A] a single match, winner-take-all. [B] a battle-royale or double-length match [i.e., 3 or 4 periods, with the same overall distribution as regular packets; higher total score wins]. [C] a weighted best-of-3. [D] an unweighted best-of-3. *****************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST