1) The topics aren't threaded. With most newsgroup readers, they are; which makes it much easier to follow a discussion. With the club being a primary means of discourse, to respond to a vein of discussion may require backing up to review or quote from a message 60 or 70 messages ago, though only posted a few days ago. Threads promote discourse and debate, while allowing those interested in specific topics to follow them more easily. Of course, this is a club - not a newsgroup. But in the transition of our primary medium of discussion from newsgroup to mailing list to club on a portal, I can't help but feel that we've devolved instead of evolved. 2) In Yahoo!, anonymity rules. In a newsgroup, it's harder to be anonymous. I have campaigned against anonymous posting in all quiz bowl discussion fora since 1993. In a Yahoo club, due to natural privacy concerns, it's usually quite difficult to tell at first glance who is affiliated where, whom you are actually talking to, or whether the people you're conversing with are several people or just one person masquerading under several aliases. Anonymous posting is the first resort of cowards; yet disclosing details may leave one vulnerable to spam or identity theft. Mailing lists and newsgroups have safety mechanisms against these problems that Yahoo! does not. This is not to say that I don't appreciate this club - I am in fact supportive of having as many media of communications as possible. But, in most academic competition discussion having moved from the newsgroup to the mailing list, and then from the mailing list to the club, have we given up more or gained more? /venting off Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST