Peter writes:
<<In other words, if
two teams, A and B, are playing in the same division
at the same SCT, then depending on the results of
*other* SCTs, NAQT's formula might rank A above B, or B
above A. This shows that the ranking system is
absurd.>>
While I don't know the exact method NAQT uses, I am
fairly certain this is incorrect.
As near as I
can tell, the strength-of-schedule factor takes the
from X/K: X varies from team-to-team, while K is the
average SOS for all teams.
The correction affects
the way teams are ordered *between* sectionals. It
has no bearing on the order *within* a
sectional.
--STI