Re: Of General Interest

• From: nacutie_wannabe
• Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:42:04 -0700
• Message-ID: <000TII8CS.001C7S7BI.12170551-quizbowl_at_...>

<<<<Which facts would you like
revealed?>>>

Let's start with your name. It's easy to take the
potshots that the crowd does when you hide behind a mask
of anonymity and therefore do not allow me a chance
to see my accusers. And you WONDER why I'm
paranoid?>

I think that the sheer number of people I _could_
be speaks volumes and adds to the message. After
all, if there were only one person to whom my identity
could readily be assigned, that would diminish the
value of my point; it could, in that case, be assumed
that it were my gripe and my gripe alone. But this way
illustrates much better how many people potentially feel this
way.

<Um, no. If you were to actually see some of these
conversations, 99% of the time, I will point blank ask what I'm
doing wrong, and the response I will get is "I've
already told you that several times.">

That was
not a wise thing to post, considering that some of
the women in question have shown me the conversations
which you have conducted with them. They were true to
the form which I described.

<EXCUSE ME! I
have *never*, EVER, done anything of the sort. I do
NOT make "crude sexual references" to people. I do
NOT treat women as some object. And just the fact
that you have printed that means that you're obviously
going on fourth-hand hearsay rather than concrete
evidence.>

Again, I can think of at least ten women off of the top
of my head who would dispute
that.

NACutie_Wannabe