As a high school player myself, all I know is that NAQT is much cheaper, since its $175 for the whole team as compared to up to $325 per person, and has twice the amount of matches. And, see, if I wanted to go on vacation, I'd go on a vacation and not to a quiz bowl tounrament that would waste the valuable limited resources that we have. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris White" <cwhite2_at_...> To: <quizbowl_at_yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: [quizbowl] Re: NAQT thoughts... | --- In quizbowl_at_y..., ufilthycur <no_reply_at_y...> wrote: | | > As for responding to Chris's comments, I believe his comments | > asserting that your average high school quizbowler would go for | > location and crappy tournament over a well-run academic tournament | > iare certainly more his opinion than actual fact. | | All I know is that *everyone* on my old team, and just about every HS | team I knew (or my advisor old me about) would prefer the location, | with the exception of a particular prep school in the area that | apparently was too good even for NAQT. I wouldn't be surprised if | there was a cadre of well-established, rich, HS teams that avoid Chip, | but a middle-class public school like mine will, I'm convinced, always | get seduced by the promise of an exciting vacation. I'm just going by | personal experience here, feel free to discount it if you wish. | | | | | To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: | quizbowl-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com | | | | Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ | | | |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:46 AM EST EST