Well, it's 4am and I can't sleep. What to do? Reflect and expound. That's what the Internet is for. How to interpret Dave Goodman becoming the youngest millionaire (thus far) on WWtBaM? Well, I can only call it a fitting capstone to what has been a tumultuous, adolescent year for QB. Just a brief summary of the events since this time last year (and I'm doing this from memory on a caffeine lingering, so I may be completely out of the ballpark for some of these): - CBCI declared bankruptcy of some kind - WWtBaM (and carbon copies) premiered - NLIT 9 proved that the circuit can self-police - Penn Bowl reached 60 or so teams - New programs appeared at (short, regional list) Bryn Mawr, George Mason, Yeshiva; JHU, GW, UMCP all expanded - The high school circuit expanded generally; NAQT HS Nationals expanded from 26 to 52 teams To hearken back to the records, at this time last year, people were saying nice things about Mad City Masters and Capital [sic.] Punishment I. I'd like an assessment. I don't have all the records here -- I purge my e-mails frequently -- but I'd like to put forth the hypotheses that, in the past year: - The number of active circuit teams outside CBI has increased Agree, new programs sprang up and fewer died off, which is a good thing indeed. Sustaining a program is just as important as founding one. - The size of active teams has generally increased Hard to say, but I think that most places at least stayed the same size which is important. - Tournament attendance has generally increased This could also be pointed out that the number of available tournaments increased, which led to this number, which is still important. - Nationwide recognition for QB-style achievement has generally increased. Yes, from squat to squat and a half. We're still toiling in the backwater of the backwater of obscuirity on a national scale. You'd be lucky to have 3 people out of 100 average Americans surveyed by Wiggery and Associates have a basic idea what "College Bowl" or "Academic Competitions" are. Am I complaining, no, I am merely stating that we are still very much under the radar and that if people do want to work to increase the visability of programs like ours from mere curiosity to actually something people care about, or at the very least, know what they are, we still have a long way to go to achieve that. - And these are all Good Things
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST