I'm 99% sure that I've figured it out, but I see no reason in posting it (if only because what I'm doing below is, for some inexplicable reason, fun.) Based on my conclusion, I'll analyze your statements. --Don't worry, I find it fun as well. I have my own suspicions but of course I could be wrong, as could you ;) (Unless you've received a signed confession.) >>1. This person has at least a peripheral involvement in PACE, or is closest enough to someone who does to know something about nationals.<< No to the first part, I'm pretty sure yes to the second. --Agreed. Mentioning PACE shows she has to know someone involved with PACE. There are not that many females actively involved with PACE, mind you ... >>2.This person has been to Penn Bowl (not a particularly helpful clue, but still)<< Yes. --Agreed also. >>3.This person has most likely spent some or all of their playing time in the East, Mid East, or Mid Atlantic. I say this because I have generally found behavior to be better in the mid-west and more symptomatic of what she describes in the previously mentioned areas.<< No. --I was unaware that behaviour was different in different areas. Does anyone else have any commentaria on this? >>4.This person most likely knows Andy (he said it, I didn't)<< Yes. --Heh. I have to agree. I *DO* hope this was not some thinly veiled comment against Andy. >>5. This person has been around at least a few years.<< Yes. --Long enough to know better. >>6. This person most likely does not have a significant other involved in QB.<< Yes (i.e., the statement is correct.) --But has this person ever had at any point a significant other involved in QB?? :) Shawn Pickrell
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST