I'll be sending an official set of rules to Edmund later today, but here's a subset: * The rounds will be an take-off on Eric Hillemann's singles format, but depending on the number of people who show up (I've heard the remote possibility of as many as 40, but I think that may have been my wildest dreams), we may deviate wildly after "qualifying". * No matter what the format, for Round 1, players will choose where to play based on first-come, first-serve. * Tossups will have power marks. I set them. Don't even think of arguing over this. If I put the mark too early, consider that I thought the subject better known than it was. If I put it too late, you're welcome. * The top 5 finishers will receive some prizes. * Questions so far have tended to be 3.5-6.5 lines long in 12-pt Times New Roman font with 1" margins. I made them longer than usual in most cases because (a) I had a lot of knowledge about it and (b) instead of two competing sides, there could be as many as eight. * All qualifying rounds will have lengths that are multiples of 20 questions. Within each set of 20, there will be 4 "sports" questions, 4 "movie" questions, 4 "music" questions, 4 "TV" questions, and 4 "other" questions. * I have finished the movie questions. Distribution runs to about 60% naming the movie from plot features, about 20% naming the Hollywood movie personality, and about 20% naming the plot element (character, event, etc.). And for those of you geeks out there, the movie section contains at least 15% info that can be classified as sci-fi. * Any resemblance between questions in this tournament and questions in any tournament you've ever seen before is purely coincidental. There is one more possible rule I wish to introduce, but I will devote a separate post to explaining it, and will leave it to a closed vote and open debate. Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:44 AM EST EST