I'm not sure what you're referring to in my packet Edmund. Here are the only three clues (all in bonuses) that mentioned things not "academic" in nature. An event horizon bonus part: It is defined as the radius that a spherical mass must be compressed to in order to transform it into a black hole, or the radius at which time and space switch responsibilities. Once inside it, escape is theoretically impossible, but maybe Laurence Fishburne and Sam ONeill have something to say about it. A Sense and Sensibility bonus part: He never jacked up three pointers for Iowa State but he did break Marianne Dashwoods heart by marrying Sophia Grey for money in Sense and Sensibility. and a Jean Piaget bonus part: Both Gilligan and Kohlberg built upon the moral development theories of this Swiss psychologist, who formulated a four-step description of childhood development. If you look at old ACF packets you might know that he wrote papers on the albino sparrow and mollusks as a young boy. Now the first two just used trashy clues, and the third despite how it was phrased rewards biographical knowledge that is in no way meta-qb. It would be like referencing Benjamin Spock or Jesse Helms with their olympic medals. Besides all the information is factual and the most important facts were included. Maybe you should look something over, before you blindly rush to criticize it, or include it in your criticism. Now if you're referring to some other nasty, mysterious Meta-QB references in my packet, I'd be happy to have you point them out to me. Subash
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:45 AM EST EST