The world has ended, I agree with Andy Goss. Thoughts on various statements: "if NAQT wants to be legitamate" Um, where have you been. They are the national championship, otherwise there wouldn't be a need to waitlist teams shaun said: I didn't ask for your suggestion nor do I appreciate it. Mind your own business, and be thankful you were pulled through the Southeast by an ex-Maryland player. --- Keep your personal junk off of here. Yes, Duke is better because they have an experienced player on their team, I didn't hear you make the snide comments to Michigan It wouldn't kill you to go to St.Louis, help someone out, and remember it's only a game --- Just as money prevents teams from going to easier sectionals it also prevents them from going to more competitive sectionals from which more bids will likely be awarded. Some teams must go to the closest/cheapest no matter what. ---- Win loss is useless to compare across regions. Field strength aside, tournament format may mean that you play the best teams more times than the others and that isn't true in all regions. A team may have four losses, those four losses could come from four other teams,however, they could also come from two other teams, where those two teams played three games against each other and the team with four losses won one of those games. The point of this longwinded example: The low validity of win loss among regions. Do some disagree that BGSU was helped by their IFT performance? I'm sure they do Do I particularly care? No, we are a reasonably poor, all undergrad team who went to the only tournaments we could afford, played our best, NAQT decided we deserved a bid. We are glad. See (most of you) in april. Beth who in no way officially speaks for BGSU AQT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0: Sat 12 Feb 2022 12:30:43 AM EST EST